It starts with two names.
No recitals, no “whereas.” The agreement opens by saying who promises what to whom — and because it is mutual, you both make the same promise. Watch the document: Acme Robotics, Inc. in Austin, which builds inspection robots, and Nordvind Analytics LLC in Houston, which would analyze what they record, are being filled in now.
WHY MUTUAL? WHEN ONLY ONE SIDE PROMISES, THE OTHER HOLDS ALL THE CARDS. WHEN BOTH MAKE THE SAME PROMISE, THERE IS LESS TO ARGUE ABOUT.
It protects what you forgot to label.
Most leaks were never stamped “confidential” — they were said out loud in a meeting. The definition’s tail, “or that a reasonable person would understand to be confidential,” catches what nobody got around to marking.
MARK IT ANYWAY: TEXAS AND FEDERAL LAW PROTECT A TRADE SECRET ONLY IF ITS OWNER TOOK REASONABLE MEASURES TO KEEP IT SECRET (CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 134A.002(6); 18 U.S.C. § 1839(3)).
It says what they cannot do with it.
Not passing it on is only half the job. “Only for the Purpose” stops the other side from quietly using your designs, your figures or your customer list for anything beyond the pilot you are actually discussing — and a prototype you lend may be taken apart only as far as the pilot requires.
NO NONCOMPETE: THE AGREEMENT STOPS NOBODY FROM COMPETING — ONLY FROM USING THE OTHER SIDE’S INFORMATION.
It knows when to end.
An agreement that lasts forever sounds strong but is harder to sign and harder to live with. Acme and Nordvind chose two years of sharing from the last signature and three years of duties after that — and a trade secret stays protected for as long as it remains a trade secret.
YOUR CHOICE: ONE, TWO OR THREE YEARS OF SHARING, AND TWO, THREE OR FIVE YEARS AFTER — THE FORM SAYS WHEN EACH FITS.
It tells whistleblowers where they stand.
Federal law shields an individual who discloses a trade secret in confidence to a government official or an attorney, solely to report or investigate a suspected violation of law, or in a filing under seal. An employer must give notice of that immunity in any contract with an employee, contractor or consultant that governs confidential information, or it cannot be awarded exemplary damages or attorney fees under the Defend Trade Secrets Act against that person. Section 7.3 gives the notice, whoever signs.
WHAT IT NEVER STOPS: A REPORT TO A GOVERNMENT AGENCY, A WORD WITH THE SEC’S STAFF (RULE 21F-17), OR SPEAKING ABOUT A SEXUAL ASSAULT OR HARASSMENT DISPUTE (THE SPEAK OUT ACT) — SECTION 7.2 SAYS SO.
And it ends in ink.
That is the whole agreement. Six pages with the guide, and nothing you could not explain to the person signing across the table. You have just signed it by scrolling — imagine how fast the real one gets signed.
Get this exact document — $1